Top 10 Best Regression Testing Tools In 2024

Best Regression Testing Tools will be described in this article.  Regression testing is something that we have already thoroughly discussed. Let’s go over ten regression testing tools in this blog post, along with how using TestGrid for regression testing simplifies the app testing process for your team.

Testing done to make sure a software code change has no impact on the product’s current functionality is known as regression testing.

Top 10 Best Regression Testing Tools In 2024

In this article, you can know about Regression Testing Tools here are the details below;

This guarantees that any new additions, bug patches, or modifications to current features will work properly with the product. Test cases that have already been run are run again in order to verify the impact of the change.

If you make frequent changes to your product, the expense of regression testing will increase. Manual execution in these situations adds to the expense and duration of the test.

Regression test case automation is a sensible decision in such circumstances. The amount of test cases that can be used again in later regression cycles indicates the degree of automation.

#1 Selenium

Pros of Selenium:

·  Extensive library of plugins and extensions

Numerous plugins can increase the standard capability of Selenium. For instance, selenium has formally supported a few of these.

You may find an extension for simple connection with Jenkins or Eclipse, two of your favorite programming products, if you Google “Selenium plugins tool name>.”

These add-ons are offered for WebDriver, Grid, and the Selenium IDE. The latter is very comprehensive, strengthening the tool’s shortcomings and preparing it for production use.

· Third-party Integrations

The use of build systems, reporting tools, and other components of the development/testing stack by QAs is unaffected by Selenium. Rather, it functions nicely with popular tools such as JUnit, SauceLabs, Selenium-Grid, and Extent.

·  Language-Independent

To automate their tests with Selenium, QAs working on a particular language do not need to pick up a new language. Language bindings for C#, Java, Ruby & the JavaScript, PHP, and Python are provided by Selenium. For the remaining languages, there are also a few unofficial language bindings.

· Huge community

A data-driven research company called Enlyft (previously iDataLabs) provides an interesting analysis of the software testing tools market.

Incredible numbers show that Selenium has a remarkable 27.48 percent market share software testing tools, with Apache Jmeter being its closest competition at slightly over 10%.

Selenium has gained a following of engineers from both startups and large corporations like Google. According to job advertisements, selenium proficiency is a necessary ability for QA specialists.

Alternatives to selenium exist, as was previously indicated, but they can cost anywhere from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars. It is important to have a fantastic free tool available to retain current testers and attract new ones to Selenium.

·  No Licensing cost

The use of selenium does not come with any up-front fees or obligations. Rather, it is open-source, enabling the underlying framework to be extended and modified for either personal or professional use.

Cons of selenium:

• only functions while testing web applications.
• Mobile automation is not supported by Selenium.
• Neither barcodes nor Captchas are generated automatically by it.
• The reporting feature is not integrated.
• With dynamic pages, it is inaccurate.
• It is not possible to test the photographs.
• Automation requires a great degree of expertise.
• Relying on Cucumber for information gathering.

Pricing: $2800 for one person, $850 for each additional machine, and more users are available.

#2 IBM Rational Functional Tester

Pros of IBM Rational Functional Tester:

• Screenshots with timestamps, verifications, and comprehensive information about the actions are all included in an HTML execution log.
• The help was first-rate, and responses were given promptly. IBM frequently provides updates to meet customer requests and fix problems.
• They were all equipped with a playback monitor, a sizable functional library, and a reliable object inspector.

Cons of IBM Rational Functional Tester:

• Updates and installations weren’t always perfect. It would be essential to remove any prior installations or reinstall Java, though, if there were any issues.
• Other than Internet Explorer, there is either no support or very little.
• It uses up a lot of memory and can make major tests more difficult to remember.

Cost: $3,500 per month

#03 Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing (UFT)

Pros of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing:

• Updates and installations weren’t always perfect. It would be essential to remove any prior installations or reinstall Java, though, if there were any issues.
• Other than Internet Explorer, there is either no support or very little.
• It uses up a lot of memory and can make major tests more difficult to remember.

Cons of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing:

• Assistance with reporting in several formats need to be achievable. Reports can be exported from UFT in HTML or PDF format, with the option to export detailed or short reports. Expanding report exporting to include Excel, CSV, XML, XSLT, and MHT formats would be much welcomed.
• Their performance has to be enhanced. Long continuous automation script executions can degrade performance on the test environment and produce inconsistent results; this is a problem that needs to be addressed eventually.
• Consistency must be upheld when executing.

Cost: A complimentary trial is offered.

#4 Sahi Pro

Pros of Sahi Pro:

• Easy to use: Using the tool doesn’t require any specialized training.
• Numerous built-in APIs are available.
• Histogram, suite level, individual script level & the export excel, zip, and accessible error analysis are just a few of the many capabilities available in reporting.
• Using the tool is easy.
• It only requires light coding knowledge and the use of built-in APIs; substantial coding knowledge is not necessary.
• The navigation to custom functions and their use are both straightforward.
• One useful feature is that it can run as a suite, and suite analysis is easy to use.
• An easy-to-manage and great feature for script execution is the DD CSV file.

Cons of Sahi Pro:

• It is a slow tool, particularly when using the local computer.
• Sadly, the UI is subpar and seems to have come from a student project.
• On the other hand, a large number of defects and bug fixes are present.
• Robust web element detection is required.
• An auto-correct tool or something similar may display the ideal web element id to use based on the past pass/fail ids.
• There is no internal chat feature for exchanging messages with other script writers.
• It’s an isolated tool without an integrated forum where all coworkers can post issues, exchange ideas, and exchange information.
• Combining the User Interface (UI) with the API and returning to the UI when execution is not possible
• The repository for built-in features and APIs ought to expand with time.
• Cost: $58 per month; free trials available

#05 WATIR

Pros of WATIR:

• It’s a Ruby library here.
• Multiple browsers (and OS systems) are supported
• possesses a strong API
• A “Simple” class is available (for non-tech users)
• Because Watij & Watin (Java &.NET) wait for the page to fully load and recognize when Watir’s API has done so, they give the impression of being more stable and uncomplicated. It is therefore more plentiful than selenium.
• gives me the ability to programmatically access the windows of the linked and original domains from the same test using the “attach” technique.

Cons of WATIR:

• Unless you’d rather study Watij or Watin, you have to learn Ruby.
• Every browser requires its own library. Also check AI Productivity Tools

Cost: Nothing

#06 TestComplete

Pros of TestComplete:

• recognizing UI elements and the application’s structure
• Test script extensibility with script extensions and plugins.
• low entry barrier (it’s easy to get started, and some people can contribute fundamentally without much explanation)
• It is possible to integrate Jira for reporting purposes.
• Working concurrently results in comparatively minimal (and typically easy to resolve) git conflicts. Even for iterative tests, handling the test data is simple.

Cons of TestComplete:

• There is a lot of copy/paste in the documentation, especially in the areas of scripting, script extensions, and plugins.
• The Name Mapping may become unstable and occasionally crash when modifying, renaming, or relocating objects.
• When using several displays with varying resolutions, TestComplete may have trouble because it is not entirely dpi aware. This might lead to “click” events that do not actually strike the button and excessively big or small program sizes when the application is sized based on a screen that is not there.

Pricing:

• Available for Free Trial
• $6,519 is the TestComplete Base.
• $10,150 for TestComplete Pro to

#07 SILKTEST

Pros of SILKTEST:

• After testing, produce documentation with ease and speed.
• It encourages productive cooperation between developers, testers, and business users.
• Domain-Specific Languages (DSL) are used in it.
• BDD enables you to accept tests in small, manageable parts and establish specifications.
• It promotes the earliest feasible development of functional characteristics.
• You can use it to concentrate test runs on particular functional areas.

Cons of SILKTEST:

• It takes time to the create maintain feature files.
• Writing feature files requires a great deal of dialogue.
• The BDD documentation ought to be retained as a result.
• Writing automation code takes more time.

Cost: A complimentary trial is offered.

#08 Serenity

Pros of Serenity:

• It swiftly and simply generates papers once testing is finished.
• It encourages productive cooperation between developers, testers, and business users.
• Domain-Specific Languages (DSL) are used in it.
• BDD enables you to accept tests in small, manageable parts and establish specifications.
• It promotes the earliest feasible development of functional characteristics.
• You can use it to concentrate test runs on particular functional areas.

Cons of Serenity:

• It takes time to the create and maintain feature files.
• Writing feature files requires a great deal of dialogue.
• The BDD documentation ought to be retained as a result.
• Writing automation code takes more time.

Cost: A complimentary trial is offered

#09 RANOREX STUDIO

Pros of RANOREX STUDIO:

• Testing on Various Systems

You can test apps on various platforms, including desktop, mobile, and the web, with Ranorex.

Numerous of its rivals lack this functionality. For instance, it makes use of the integrated Selenium WebDriver integration, which makes cross-browser web testing possible across a variety of operating systems and browsers.

• Conduct testing in the absence of testing

With the usage of Ranorex’s recorder feature, users may test their graphical user interfaces (GUIs) without coding scripts thanks to keyword-driven testing. To ensure that your keywords are used throughout your test cases, all you need to do is set them at the beginning.

This makes the entire testing process much easier to read and design, saving a substantial amount of time spent creating and rewriting scripts. Additionally, novices in automation can automate data-driven or keyword-driven testing by utilizing the integrated methodology of Ranorex Studio.

• Friendly User Interface

Both the test automation tools and the interface are the easiest to use in Ranorex.

To make the process of building, recording, and analyzing your automated test series easier for you to grasp, they offer tools like prepared demos and comprehensive instructions in three different languages.

• Monitoring of Pictures

The ground-breaking object recognition capability of Ranorex Studio recognizes any shift in an image’s position within its interface in a GUI that has already been tested.

It has GUI recognition components that help in locating and modifying UI elements inside an application, such RanorXPath, Ranorex Spy, and others. However, Selenium does not offer its consumers this kind of functionality.

• Effective teamwork

In order to facilitate effective collaboration between the development and testing teams, Ranorex provides its users with cross-fictional team solutions. All team members can collaborate to produce successful solutions by lending each other test automation modules and reusable object repositories.

• Summaries of Reports

Ranorex creates a thorough Run Summary Report at the conclusion of every test run on its platform, complete with screenshots for confirmation.

Their reports are thorough, integrating both recent and prior test runs. The reports can be generated in a format that is compatible with Junit or as a PDF, and they are completely customisable.

Cons of RANONEX STUDIO:

• Purchased License

Unlike many open-source rivals like Selenium, Katalon Studio, Watir, and others, Ranorex is a licensed, paid tool.

• Limited Assistance in Language

Ranorex Studio only supports the two scripting languages for coding, C# and VB.NET, in contrast to Selenium.

• Mac OS X is not supported by it.

MacOS and Ranorex do not integrate. Because it is built in.NET, running it on macOS requires using the Mono project, which is not supported by Ranorex.

• There’s no backing from the community.

Compared to its open-source rivals Selenium and Watir, Ranorex has a far smaller community, which makes it challenging to locate answers to common problems online.

• Unusual Updates

Despite Ranorex’s rapid release schedule, many of its new versions have flaws that need to be resolved.

Because it takes time to update the current suite for automation testing, new versions have an influence on a developer’s day-to-day operations by slowing down the overall testing process.

Cost: $3,590.00 for each license

#10 Telerik Test Studio

Pros of Telerik Test Studio:

• Telerik Test Studio is very easy to use and intuitive to learn.
• Good language support; Test Studio supports C# and VB.NET if needed, but in many cases does not require code.
• In order to assist with more complicated, edge-case scenarios, testers can create, manage, and transfer tests to developers via source control.
• Test Studio provides strong support for data-driven testing. You can correlate recorded test steps with a data source thanks to their data-related features. Numerous data sources are supported by Test Studio. It also has a data grid that lets you rapidly create your data source inside of your test.
• An full suite of HTML and Silverlight control translators that abstract away the control details is included in the Test Studio software testing solution, in addition to native Telerik control compatibility. Testers can rapidly and simply construct automated tests for sophisticated control-based applications with the aid of these translators.
• There is support for custom controls. On occasion, developers will expand the components they utilize to build their apps. The base class of the control is immediately identified by Test Studio, which then recommends verifications for that base control, including mouse actions, quick tasks, and action handling.
• There is native support for Telerik RadControls. Because Telerik RadControls are so well-known, Test Studio can automatically identify and offer customized verification if your applications are built with Telerik AJAX, Silverlight, or WPF controls. This means that you can test even the most complicated controls, such hierarchical grids and schedules.
• Automated testing can be done on emulators and real devices without writing a single line of code.

Cons of Telerik Test Studio:

• Test Studio is a stand-alone program; to utilize a Visual Studio plugin, you’ll need to purchase a second, professional, or higher license.
• Since you cannot reuse components from one project in another, you will only be able to build one task, which will eventually become laborious. But that depends on how big your application is. One workaround is to copy and paste text from one project to another.
• All of your stages can be converted to code, but they cannot be undone.
• The problem with the “If-else” statement’s usability is that it requires the presence of your element in the “If” condition in order to be used; if it isn’t, the test case as a whole fails.
• Only WPF is supported; testing of desktop and Android apps is not supported.
• You will need to write code if you need to build customized reports.
• If the DOM of your application is huge, Test Studio will cause many performance issues when recording, including Test Studio and Application stopping. For this, you have to use the trial version first.
• It’s neither a cheap tool, nor is it free.
• All features require a strong computer to operate.
• Although there are many customization possibilities, setting them up takes time.

Pricing: $2,499.00 is the starting license fee.

How To Select Regression Testing Tools for Web Applications?

A few of the most important things to think about while choosing a regression testing solution for web application testing are listed below.

#01 Easy to Maintain

To adjust the tests in the event of an application change, the impacted automated test cases must be traced back. For instance, a modification could be linked to multiple automated tests, both direct and indirect, rather than simply one.

Each change needs to be recognized and assessed to see if maintenance is necessary. Maintaining the application will become more important as its prospects grow.

Tests for regression testing must be able to be automatically maintained by the automated tool following every modification.

In the event that the user interface changes, the automated regression testing tool needs to be smart enough to automatically fix the tests.

Furthermore, the automated regression testing tool ought to facilitate the easy modification of test cases in order to incorporate any necessary changes.

#02 Prioritization test cases for regression testing

If you make changes to your source code, you might need to rerun only the tests that are potentially relevant to make sure the tests still pass.

Using automated regression testing tools, for instance, you can assign a high, medium low priority to test cases to indicate the proper sequence in which to run them. You can also transfer the automated tests to a new category or rearrange the tests in a different sequence if needed.

#03 Should Be Easy To Maintain

To adjust the tests in the event of an application change, the impacted automated test cases must be traced back. For instance, a modification could be linked to multiple automated tests, both direct and indirect, rather than simply one.

Each change needs to be recognized and assessed to see if maintenance is necessary. Maintaining the application will become more important as its prospects grow. Tests for automated regression testing need to be able to be automatically updated upon modifications.

In the event that the user interface changes, the automated regression testing tool needs to be smart enough to automatically fix the tests. Furthermore, the automated tool for regression testing should also make it easy to adjust the test cases to reflect the changes, if needed.

#04 Detailed Reports

To track all of the test case data, including the number of tests run, their status, the test suite’s visual logs, which include screenshots and videos, error logs, and more, regression testing tools must provide this reporting function.

You should be able to make well-informed decisions with the automated regression testing tool by monitoring the status of test runs by operating system, browser version, or resolution configuration.

#05 Allow collaboration

QA teams need to go over and eliminate duplicates from optimal regression test cases. Regression testing can go more smoothly when a team collaborates well and effectively discusses the risks involved in the regression.

The automated regression testing platform should facilitate simple teamwork to exchange timely updates and useful feedback, allowing developers to promptly implement the required modifications.

#06 Parallel execution

In order to save you time during execution, regression automation testing systems should be able to arrange your tests to run in different settings simultaneously as often as you’d like.

Using additional datasets expected to change in various execution contexts at each step, such as development, testing, staging, and production, it is required to discover variables sensitive to various execution environments. Also check Bug Reporting Tools For Developers

#06 Quick Feedback

Automated regression testing yield quicker findings. You will be able to make wise release selections with the help of automated regression testing tools’ fast checks.

In order to expedite turnaround times and promptly address concerns, feedback must be received as soon as possible to ensure that the product is released on schedule.

#07 Easy Script Creation and Maintenance

Test automation scripts should be reasonably easy to write, especially when employing agile delivery approaches that demand high velocity.

Every sprint will require new regression tests, and without the proper tool, you’ll have to invest a lot of time in upgrading your tests whenever your app under test is modified.

To avoid having to spend additional time rewriting your automated regression tests, you also need to be able to quickly construct automated tests and make sure that they can adjust to small changes.

#08 Reusability And Scalability

If your app is being tested and the code change impacts it, you should be able to simply handle all affected tests without having to rewrite each test script. You should be able to modularize your tests using your chosen functional regression testing tool.

To make creating new tests faster, you should also be able to compile a library of scripts or reusable test snippets. Furthermore, you want to employ data-driven testing techniques that let you apply a single test to an infinite number of cases.

Conclusion:

Functional regression testing’s main objective is to find differences between the old and new code and confirm that the modifications made are functioning as intended.

To put it simply, visual regression testing tools are used to find out if the application’s previous functionality still works and if any new changes have introduced defects or affected it.

There are many different web regression testing tools on the market these days; some of the more notable ones are covered in this article.

Contacting a reputable software testing company will be your best bet if you want to perform regression analysis for one of your unique projects. They can offer you a detailed roadmap tailored to your requirements.

Without writing a single line of code, TestGrid is the preferred all-in-one solution for developing, running, and continuously improving automated tests.

It is an integrated tool that simplifies and allows for flexibility in your testing process. It can be installed on-site cloud with secure access, and it is compatible with all major browsers and OS versions.

Sign up with Test Grid to get end-to-end solutions for all of your automated regression testing needs in one convenient location.

The ideal option is TestGrid’s excellent scriptless automated testing since it is easy to use and saves costs, time, and resources. The quality of the tests is very good, with a few anomalies.